81. Actions for Specific Performance, etc., Summary Judgment.
ORDER 81
ACTIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, ETC.,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1. Application by plaintiff for summary judgment. (O. 81 r. 1)
(1) In any action begun by writ indorsed with a claim–
(a) for specific performance of an agreement (whether in writing or not) for the sale, purchase or exchange of any property, or for the grant or assignment of a lease of any property, with or without an alternative claim for damages; or
(b) for rescission of such an agreement; or
(c) for the forfeiture or return of any deposit made under such an agreement,
the plaintiff may, on the ground that the defendant has no defence to the action, apply to the Court for judgment.
(2) An application may be made against a defendant under this rule whether or not he has entered an appearance in the action.
2. Manner in which application under Rule 1 must be made. (O. 81 r. 2)
(1) An application under rule 1 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit made by some person who can swear positively to the facts verifying the cause of action and stating that in his belief there is no defence to the action.
(2) The summons must set out or have attached thereto minutes of the judgment sought by the plaintiff.
(3) The summons, a copy of the affidavit in support and of any exhibit referred to therein must be served on the defendant within 14 days from the date of issue of the summons. [Am. PU(A)342/2000 w.e.f. 22 Sept 2000]
2A. Affidavits. (O. 81, r. 2A) .
Order 32 rule 13(2) shall apply mutatis mutandis to all affidavits in respect of an application under this Order.
[Ins. PU(A)342/2000 w.e.f. 22 Sept 2000]
3. Judgment for plaintiff. (O. 81 r. 3)
Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 1 either the Court dismisses the application or the defendant satisfies the Court that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried or that there ought for some other reason to be a trial of the action, the Court may give judgment for the plaintiff in the action.
4. Leave to defend. (O. 81 r. 4)
(1) A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 1 by affidavit or otherwise to the satisfaction of the Court.
(2) The Court may give a defendant against whom such an application is made leave to defend the action either unconditionally or on such terms as to giving security or time or mode of trial or otherwise as it thinks fit.
(3) On the hearing of such an application the Court may order a defendant showing cause or, where that defendant is a body corporate, any director, manager, secretary or other similar officer thereof, or any person purporting to act in any such capacity–
(a) to produce any document;
(b) if it appears the Court that there are special circumstances which make it desirable that he should do so, to attend and be examined on oath.
5. Directions. (O. 81 r. 5)
Where the Court orders that a defendant have leave to defend the action, the Court shall give directions as to the further conduct of action, and, if the Court so directs, Order 25, rules 2 to 7, shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary modification apply as if the application under rule 1 were a summons for directions.
6. Costs. (O. 81 r. 6)
If the plaintiff makes an application under rule 1 where the case is not within this Order, or if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant relied on a contention which would entitle him to unconditional leave to defend, then, without prejudice to Order 59, and, in particular, to rule 4(1) thereof, the Court may dismiss the application with costs and may, if the plaintiff is not an assisted person, require the costs to be paid by him forthwith.
7. Setting aside judgment. (O. 81 r. 7 )
Any judgment given against a defendant who does not appear at the hearing of an application under rule 1 may be set aside or varied by the Court on such terms as it thinks just.
ORDER 81
ACTIONS FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE, ETC.,
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
1. Application by plaintiff for summary judgment. (O. 81 r. 1)
(1) In any action begun by writ indorsed with a claim–
(a) for specific performance of an agreement (whether in writing or not) for the sale, purchase or exchange of any property, or for the grant or assignment of a lease of any property, with or without an alternative claim for damages; or
(b) for rescission of such an agreement; or
(c) for the forfeiture or return of any deposit made under such an agreement,
the plaintiff may, on the ground that the defendant has no defence to the action, apply to the Court for judgment.
(2) An application may be made against a defendant under this rule whether or not he has entered an appearance in the action.
2. Manner in which application under Rule 1 must be made. (O. 81 r. 2)
(1) An application under rule 1 must be made by summons supported by an affidavit made by some person who can swear positively to the facts verifying the cause of action and stating that in his belief there is no defence to the action.
(2) The summons must set out or have attached thereto minutes of the judgment sought by the plaintiff.
(3) The summons, a copy of the affidavit in support and of any exhibit referred to therein must be served on the defendant within 14 days from the date of issue of the summons. [Am. PU(A)342/2000 w.e.f. 22 Sept 2000]
2A. Affidavits. (O. 81, r. 2A) .
Order 32 rule 13(2) shall apply mutatis mutandis to all affidavits in respect of an application under this Order.
[Ins. PU(A)342/2000 w.e.f. 22 Sept 2000]
3. Judgment for plaintiff. (O. 81 r. 3)
Unless on the hearing of an application under rule 1 either the Court dismisses the application or the defendant satisfies the Court that there is an issue or question in dispute which ought to be tried or that there ought for some other reason to be a trial of the action, the Court may give judgment for the plaintiff in the action.
4. Leave to defend. (O. 81 r. 4)
(1) A defendant may show cause against an application under rule 1 by affidavit or otherwise to the satisfaction of the Court.
(2) The Court may give a defendant against whom such an application is made leave to defend the action either unconditionally or on such terms as to giving security or time or mode of trial or otherwise as it thinks fit.
(3) On the hearing of such an application the Court may order a defendant showing cause or, where that defendant is a body corporate, any director, manager, secretary or other similar officer thereof, or any person purporting to act in any such capacity–
(a) to produce any document;
(b) if it appears the Court that there are special circumstances which make it desirable that he should do so, to attend and be examined on oath.
5. Directions. (O. 81 r. 5)
Where the Court orders that a defendant have leave to defend the action, the Court shall give directions as to the further conduct of action, and, if the Court so directs, Order 25, rules 2 to 7, shall, with the omission of so much of rule 7(1) as requires parties to serve a notice specifying the orders and directions which they require and with any other necessary modification apply as if the application under rule 1 were a summons for directions.
6. Costs. (O. 81 r. 6)
If the plaintiff makes an application under rule 1 where the case is not within this Order, or if it appears to the Court that the plaintiff knew that the defendant relied on a contention which would entitle him to unconditional leave to defend, then, without prejudice to Order 59, and, in particular, to rule 4(1) thereof, the Court may dismiss the application with costs and may, if the plaintiff is not an assisted person, require the costs to be paid by him forthwith.
7. Setting aside judgment. (O. 81 r. 7 )
Any judgment given against a defendant who does not appear at the hearing of an application under rule 1 may be set aside or varied by the Court on such terms as it thinks just.
No comments:
Post a Comment